Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IDK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to I Don't Know. Amid general indifference... Sandstein 08:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IDK[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This should be deleted because first of all, it's a definition, and that belongs in Wikidictionary. Also, it has no sources. Alsamrudo (talk) 22:24, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:50, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:50, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Until August 2016 this was a WP:Soft redirect to Wiktionary, which seems reasonable. Redirecting to the disambiguation page I Don't Know would be in the spirit of the current content and the pre-August 2016 hatnote, but it seems less reasonable to me given that the DAB page treats mainly song titles and not the expression as such. Deletion is not unreasonable, given the lack of encyclopedic content. If pushed, I suppose I would !vote to restore the soft redirect. Cnilep (talk) 02:23, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect to I Don't Know. No usable content. Possible someone could be looking for "I don't know" and type that? Eh. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 03:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 08:03, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.